Unraveling the Impact of Social Dominance Orientation on Pathways to Indigenization, Reconciliation, and Decolonization: A Preliminary Analysis – Indigenous Connect la loi d'origine (ᑭᐦᒋ-ᓵᑐᒫᑐᐏᐣ)

Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) is a construct in social psychology that measures an individual’s preference for inequality among social groups. People high in SDO tend to prefer hierarchies and endorse ideologies that maintain their group’s dominance. This orientation impacts attitudes toward social policies and intergroup relations. The relevance of SDO becomes particularly poignant when discussing Indigenization, reconciliation, and decolonization, especially in contexts like Canada, where these processes are integral to addressing historical and ongoing injustices against Indigenous peoples.

1. Theoretical Foundations of Social Dominance Orientation

SDO is rooted in Social Dominance Theory (SDT), proposed by Sidanius and Pratto. This theory posits that societies tend to structure themselves as group-based hierarchies where dominant groups enjoy disproportionate access to resources, power, and status. SDO is the individual-level measurement of this theory, reflecting the extent to which people endorse or reject these hierarchies.

2. SDO and Intergroup Dynamics

Individuals with high SDO are more likely to support policies and ideologies that perpetuate existing group hierarchies. This includes opposition to affirmative action, immigration, and welfare policies aimed at assisting disadvantaged groups. In contrast, those with low SDO are inclined toward egalitarianism and social equality. The intergroup dynamics shaped by SDO are crucial in understanding resistance or support for social change, particularly in the contexts of Indigenization, reconciliation, and decolonization.

3. Indigenization, Reconciliation, and Decolonization

Indigenization refers to the process of incorporating Indigenous knowledge, teaching, and practices into institutions, particularly in education and governance. Reconciliation involves repairing relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people, often focusing on acknowledging past harms and working towards a more equitable future. Decolonization involves dismantling the lingering effects of colonialism and restructuring society to address historical injustices and create equitable power dynamics.

4. The Intersection of SDO with Indigenization, Reconciliation, and Decolonization

Understanding SDO is critical in these contexts because it highlights why certain individuals or groups might resist efforts aimed at addressing historical injustices and creating a more equitable society. High SDO individuals might view these efforts as threatening to the established hierarchy, where they perceive their group to be rightfully dominant. This resistance is not merely a matter of prejudice but is also tied to a broader ideological belief system that values certain types of group-based hierarchy and dominance.

5. The Challenge of SDO in Implementing Reconciliation and Decolonization Policies

The implementation of reconciliation and decolonization policies often involves redistributing resources, power, and status – actions that high SDO individuals are likely to resist. This resistance can manifest in opposition to policies aimed at Indigenous rights, land rights, and utilizing Indigenous laws. Such opposition is not necessarily overt but can be subtle, manifesting in the reluctance to change institutional practices or curricula to include Indigenous perspectives.

6. Overcoming SDO Barriers in Promoting Indigenization and Decolonization

Addressing high levels of SDO in society is a complex challenge. It requires education and exposure to counter-stereotypical information that challenges existing beliefs about social hierarchies. Educational institutions play a critical role in this, as they can provide environments where students learn about historical injustices and the importance of equity and inclusion. Inculcating values of empathy and social justice can counteract the effects of SDO.

7. The Role of Leadership in Modulating SDO Impacts

Leaders in government, education, and community organizations can influence the societal discourse around these issues. By advocating for Indigenous law, Indigenous rights, land rights, decolonization, Indigenization and reconciliation and demonstrating commitment, transparency, and accountability to Indigenization, reconciliation and decolonization processes, they can set norms that encourage low SDO attitudes and behaviors.

8. Future Directions in Research and Policy

Future research needs to further explore the nuances of how SDO interacts with specific policies related to Indigenization, reconciliation, and decolonization. Understanding the psychological underpinnings can aid in designing more effective strategies to engage individuals with varying levels of SDO. Policymakers must consider these psychological aspects when crafting and implementing policies to ensure they are effective and resonate with a broad spectrum of the population.

9. Conclusion

In conclusion, the interplay between Social Dominance Orientation and processes like Indigenization, reconciliation, and decolonization is complex and multifaceted. Understanding SDO provides valuable insights into why some individuals and groups resist changes that aim to dismantle historical and ongoing inequalities. Addressing these challenges requires a concerted effort from educational, governmental, and community leaders to decolonize and cultivate a society that values Indigenization, decolonization, and reconciliation.

References

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. Cambridge University Press.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honoring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. TRC.
Alfred, T. (2009). Colonialism and state dependency. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 5(2), 42-60.
Wilson, S., & Yellow Bird, M. (Eds.). (2005). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
Battiste, M. (2013). Decolonizing education: Nourishing the learning spirit. Purich Publishing.
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2004). The role of dominant identity and experience in promoting social change. Journal of Social Issues, 60(3), 615-632.
Greenwood, M., & de Leeuw, S. N. (2012). Social determinants of health and the future well-being of Aboriginal children in Canada. Paediatrics & Child Health, 17(7), 381-384.
Regan, P. (2010). Unsettling the settler within: Indian residential schools, truth telling, and reconciliation in Canada. UBC Press.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1-40.